Business professional standing on a high-rise balcony overlooking a city skyline

Most hiring news right now points in one direction: down. Job postings are falling, companies are being selective, and the overall market has cooled considerably from its post-pandemic peak. But one category of jobs is holding up much better than the rest, and it’s not the one most people would guess.

Jobs that require leadership skills are weathering this slowdown. Revelio Labs analyzed job posting data and found that postings requiring leadership skills fell just 8% year-over-year, compared to a 20% decline for postings without those requirements. More than 36% of all current U.S. job postings now ask for leadership skills.

The pay data makes the story sharper. Jobs requiring leadership now pay about 40% more than comparable roles that don’t list those requirements. Two years ago, that premium was essentially zero. That kind of shift in a short window is a clear market signal, not a rounding error.
Middle management has seen the biggest jump, with leadership requirements rising 3.2 percentage points year-over-year. The AI connection explains a lot of it. Roles with higher AI exposure are seeing the largest increases in leadership demand. When routine tasks are automated, human workers shift toward oversight, exception handling, and workflow guidance. Those activities rely on leadership capabilities even when they happen outside a formal management title.

For employers, the implication is straightforward: as you integrate AI into your workflows, the workers who can coordinate people and processes around those tools become more valuable. For job seekers, the message is equally clear. Technical skills matter, but the ability to lead, manage judgment calls, and keep work moving is commanding a premium that didn’t exist two years ago and is growing fast.

If you’re building a team around AI-assisted work, a staffing partner who understands what those roles actually require can save you significant time and cost. Talk to our team to get started.

Companies Are Making Fewer Hires Because They’re Making Better Ones

Hiring has slowed sharply, but Goldman Sachs offers a more nuanced read on why. In a recent analysis, the firm’s economists found that short-term job separations, meaning workers who leave or get let go shortly after starting, have been declining for two decades and accelerated after the pandemic. The data comes from U.S. Census Bureau figures and Canadian labor force data and holds broadly across industries.

The explanation provides better information on both sides. Workers can research employers on LinkedIn, Glassdoor, and Indeed before accepting an offer. Employers are using digital screening tools, including AI, to filter out poor fits earlier. Fewer mismatches means fewer early exits, which means less need to backfill.

Goldman frames this as a more efficient labor market overall. The risk, as the firm notes, is that in a low-hiring environment, a further pullback hits displaced workers and younger job seekers hardest. Better matching efficiency doesn’t help much when there aren’t enough openings to compete for in the first place.

Related: Future of Recruiting

March Madness Will Cost Employers $12.1 Billion

The 2026 NCAA tournament is projected to cost employers $12.1 billion in lost productivity, up $2.5 billion from last year, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The increase comes despite a slightly smaller workforce. The employment-population ratio dropped to 59.3% in February 2026 from 60.1% a year earlier, but average hourly wages rose to $37.32 from $35.94, pushing the total cost higher.

About 40.3 million working Americans are expected to engage with the tournament. Of those, 26% are projected to call off work for at least one day, costing employers roughly $2.6 billion in absences. The remaining cost comes from workers spending an average of 25.5 minutes per workday on tournament activity across the 15 working days of the event.

Challenger’s advice: lean into it. For organizations still recovering from layoffs, return-to-office friction, or a difficult stretch, the tournament is a low-cost morale opportunity. Watch parties, bracket competitions, and team gear days can rebuild connection and re-engage workers who have had a hard year.

Related: Workplace Culture Ideas

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are leadership skills becoming more valuable in the job market?

Demand for leadership skills has held up much better than overall hiring, with postings requiring leadership falling just 8% year-over-year compared to 20% for other roles, per Revelio Labs. The salary premium for leadership skills has climbed to 40% above comparable roles, up from near zero in mid-2023. As companies integrate AI into their workflows, the need for workers who can coordinate people, oversee automated processes, and handle judgment calls has grown rather than shrunk.

How is AI affecting which jobs survive the hiring slowdown?

Roles with higher AI exposure are seeing the largest increases in leadership skill requirements, according to Revelio Labs. When AI automates routine tasks, human workers shift toward oversight, exception handling, and coordination. Those activities require leadership capabilities even outside formal management titles, which is why AI-exposed roles are demanding more from workers, not less.

Why are companies hiring less even though the economy is growing?

Goldman Sachs points to better matching between employers and workers as a key factor. Short-term job separations have declined for two decades, meaning fewer hires leave or get let go shortly after starting. Better screening tools, including AI, and platforms like LinkedIn and Glassdoor, have helped both sides identify stronger fits upfront. Fewer bad hires means less need to backfill, which reduces overall hiring volume even in a healthy economy.

What does March Madness actually cost employers?

Challenger, Gray & Christmas estimates the 2026 tournament will cost employers $12.1 billion in lost productivity. About 40.3 million working Americans are expected to engage with the games, with 26% projected to call off work for at least one day. Workers are estimated to spend an average of 25.5 minutes per workday on tournament-related activity across the event’s 15 working days.

Should employers try to stop workers from following March Madness?

Challenger, Gray & Christmas recommends the opposite. For teams recovering from layoffs, return-to-office mandates, or a difficult stretch, the tournament is a low-cost morale opportunity. Office pools, watch parties, and bracket competitions can rebuild connection and reengage workers. The goodwill generated tends to outweigh the productivity cost, particularly when morale is already strained.

A closeup of Pete Newsome, looking into the camera and smiling.

About Pete Newsome

Pete Newsome is the President of 4 Corner Resources, the staffing and recruiting firm he founded in 2005. 4 Corner is a member of the American Staffing Association and TechServe Alliance and has been Clearly Rated's top-rated staffing company in Central Florida for seven consecutive years. Recent awards and recognition include being named to Forbes' Best Recruiting and Best Temporary Staffing Firms in America, Business Insider's America's Top Recruiting Firms, The Seminole 100, and The Golden 100. He hosts Cornering The Job Market, a daily show covering real-time U.S. job market data, trends, and news, and The AI Worker YouTube Channel, where he explores artificial intelligence's impact on employment and the future of work. Connect with Pete on LinkedIn