The AI Jobs Apocalypse Debate, a Trade Jobs Boom, and an RTO Firing Gone Wrong

Episode 98


Episode Overview

Pete and Peter promised a lighter episode this week, and they mostly deliver. First up: a new Goldman Sachs report asking whether an “AI jobs apocalypse” is coming. Goldman’s take is more measured than the headlines suggest, spreading disruption over roughly 10 years and concentrating it in entry-level roles. MIT economist and Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu takes a harder line in the same conversation, predicting job displacement in the millions and pointing out that “no general law of economics says that job creation must match job destruction.” Pete and Peter disagree on the timeline (Pete thinks it happens faster than 10 years) but agree entry-level workers are exposed first, since their tasks are the easiest to automate.

From there, they talk through a live AI phone auto-attendant demo they sat in on this week, a Deutsche Bank report claiming AI productivity gains are still years away (Pete and Peter push back hard on that one), and why adoption looks so uneven across early adopters, cautious testers, and companies that haven’t started at all.

Then the good news: ZipRecruiter data shows apprentice-trained trade workers earn a median $91,000 a year versus $65,000 for self-taught workers, construction jobs are up 34% year over year, and manufacturing is up 32%, even as most white-collar hiring stays flat. Pete and Peter dig into why trade schools still lag colleges on marketing and admissions, and why that gap matters more now that AI is squeezing entry-level office jobs.

They also cover the NFIB small business index, where 84% of small businesses actively hiring say they can’t find qualified applicants, and close with a wild Wall Street Journal story: a co-founder at Barnhill Investments who helped write the company’s return-to-office policy got fired under that same policy for not coming in.

Key Takeaways

  • Goldman Sachs on whether an AI jobs apocalypse is coming, and Daron Acemoglu’s pushback
  • AI phone auto-attendant demo and what it means for entry-level roles
  • Deutsche Bank says AI productivity gains are years away; Pete and Peter disagree
  • Trade jobs are booming: $91K median for apprentice-trained workers vs. $65K self-taught
  • Construction up 34% YoY, manufacturing up 32% YoY
  • NFIB data: 84% of actively hiring small businesses can’t find qualified applicants
  • A co-founder fired under the RTO policy he helped write
A closeup of Pete Newsome, looking into the camera and smiling.

Pete Newsome is the President of 4 Corner Resources, the staffing and recruiting firm he founded in 2005. 4 Corner is a member of the American Staffing Association and TechServe Alliance and is a 9-time ClearlyRated Best of Staffing winner. Recent awards and recognition include being named to Forbes’ Best Recruiting and Best Temporary Staffing Firms in America, Business Insider’s America’s Top Recruiting Firms, The Seminole 100, and The Golden 100. He hosts the Cornering The Job Market podcast and YouTube channel, including The Week in Jobs, a weekly podcast and livestream on U.S. job market data, trends and news. He also hosts The AI Worker YouTube channel, where he explores artificial intelligence’s impact on employment and the future of work. Connect with Pete on LinkedIn

Recent Episodes

  • Episode Overview Bill Gates published a lengthy warning about AI’s threat to jobs this week, and Pete and Peter aren’t convinced there’s anything new in it. He predicts sales, customer support, software engineering, paralegal work, loan assessment, and data analysis are all at risk, and argues government policy needs to keep job creation in line…

    Listen Here

  • Episode Overview The Wall Street Journal reported this week that LinkedIn has a dating problem: 22% of users say they’ve sent or received a message with romantic intent on the platform, and roughly one in four think that’s acceptable behavior on a professional site. Pete and Peter also cover the flip side of that same…

    Listen Here

  • Episode Overview A leaked internal memo shows Google’s own recruiting team doesn’t fully trust the company’s AI screening tool. The memo, marked “do not share widely” and shared widely within hours, admits a “non-trivial possibility” that the AI is ignoring or ruling out qualified candidates, and now Google is asking applicants to fill out a…

    Listen Here