Man working at a cluttered office desk with a laptop surrounded by stacks of paperwork

Glassdoor released its 2026 midyear check-in today, and the number I keep coming back to is this: AI mentions in employee reviews more than tripled, up 240% year over year as of May 2026, with sentiment now running 53% negative after being 55% positive just last year. Glassdoor’s own economists say their end-of-2025 forecast “was too sanguine.” They got that right.

The report revisits six predictions Glassdoor made for the year and grades each one. Their summary of the first half: “an unfortunately grim picture of the workplace.” The data tells a more complicated story than “grim” alone captures.

Senior leadership ratings fell below 3.5 in April 2026, the worst single month since 2017. In reviews that mention leadership, “misalignment” is up 95% year over year, “disconnect” up 52%, and “distrust” up 18%. Workers have gone beyond dissatisfied; they’ve stopped believing their leaders.

The layoff picture is more complicated than the headlines. JOLTS data shows 1,692,000 workers were laid off or discharged in April 2026, slightly below the pre-pandemic monthly average of 1,809,250. On its face, a figure sitting slightly below the pre-pandemic norm. But 50% of WARN Act filings this year involved layoffs of fewer than 50 people, and mentions of job insecurity in Glassdoor reviews jumped 63% year over year in May, with layoff mentions up 29%. Glassdoor calls the pattern the “forever layoff”: small, frequent cuts with no clear end, which keeps anxiety elevated even when the headline numbers look manageable. We covered Oracle’s 21,000-job cut and what it means for white-collar AI displacement yesterday, and the two readings are directly connected.

Return to office keeps grinding forward at roughly the same pace as last year. The share of full-time days worked from home slipped to 25.7% in May 2026, down from 27.2% a year earlier. The fully remote share fell to 11.1% from 12.5%. Remote workers now report lower work-life balance scores (3.97) than hybrid workers (4.10) or in-office workers (4.03). Career opportunity ratings tell the starker story: 3.16 for remote workers versus 3.67 for in-office. If you’re managing a distributed team, your remote employees increasingly know they’re leaving career capital on the table.

Back to AI, because this is where the report gets interesting. Despite anxiety up 240% and sentiment flipping negative, Glassdoor found no statistically significant decline in overall satisfaction or career opportunity ratings for workers in jobs most exposed to AI, including early-career workers in those roles. Fear is well ahead of measurable impact.

Glassdoor’s explanation is the right one: most of what workers are feeling comes from budget reallocation, not automation. Companies cut headcount to fund AI investments, then cite AI as the reason. The job didn’t get automated; the budget got reallocated, and employees are smart enough to see the pattern. The leadership distrust numbers and the AI anxiety are feeding each other. When executives mandate AI use while using AI as cover for cuts, workers stop believing anything leadership says. A 9-year low in senior leadership ratings follows predictably from a year of that dynamic.

For job seekers, the clearest signal of how far candidate power has fallen is the offer-decline rate. Job offer refusals fell to 21.4% for interviews beginning January 1 through April 15, 2026, down 5.1 percentage points from the same period last year. People are accepting offers they would have walked away from in 2024. Early-career workers took an additional squeeze: real earnings landed 0.7% below 2020 levels as inflation rose to 3.8% in April 2026. If you’re in a role right now that compares well to what’s actually available, this is a year to build skills and stay put. If you’re looking for something better, see what’s open.

For employers, the picture runs in the opposite direction. You have more hiring power than you’ve had in years. Use it deliberately.

Workers Are Using AI Whether You’ve Planned for It or Not

A Resume Now survey of 1,020 employed U.S. adults, conducted via Pollfish in May 2026, found a clean gap between how fast workers are adopting AI and how much support employers are actually providing. One disclosure first: Resume Now sells resume-building and career tools, so this is a vendor-commissioned study with a natural interest in framing workers as under-supported. The headline figures are still credible on their face, and the pattern matches what the Glassdoor data shows.

41% of workers say their employer has provided nothing to prepare them to use AI at work. No tools, no training, no guidelines. So workers are filling the gap themselves: 76% say they’ve used AI tools they personally found and signed up for to get work done. 23% do it every single day.

The specifics on employer support are thin. Only 21% of workers say their employer provided clear AI guidelines tied to specific use cases for their role. Only 19% received comprehensive training with dedicated time and resources. And 52% say their employer provides no AI tools at all, or only the free publicly available ones.

This is shadow IT with different branding. When a company doesn’t provide the tool, employees bring their own. Workers being adaptable and motivated is an asset; what unsanctioned tool use brings along with it is the problem: company data flowing into free public chatbots, no audit trail for how decisions got made, and wildly inconsistent output quality across a team.

A memo telling people to stop won’t work. People won’t stop using tools that make them faster. The companies pulling ahead are the ones writing specific role-based AI guidelines, giving teams approved paid tools, and carving out real time for training. Right now, roughly 1 in 5 workers say their employer has actually done that. If you’re building out a workforce strategy that accounts for AI integration, that gap is part of the conversation.

Hiring Ticked Up for the First Time Since May

ADP’s weekly NER Pulse showed U.S. private employers added an average of 30,750 jobs per week for the four weeks ending June 6, 2026, produced in collaboration with the Stanford Digital Economy Lab. These figures are seasonally adjusted on a four-week moving average with a two-week lag and are preliminary subject to revision. The headline: it was the first pickup in hiring since May 2.

The context matters more than the direction. Hiring peaked at 40,750 jobs per week on May 2, then slid almost every week after that, bottoming at 26,500 for the week ending May 30. The June 6 reading of 30,750 is a bounce off that floor, not a return to the spring pace.

Call it stabilization. The labor market downshifted through May and is looking for its floor. For companies filling roles right now, urgency is gone; hiring is deliberate. For job seekers, the absolute number is small enough that even an uptick doesn’t change conditions much on the ground.

ADP releases the next NER Pulse on July 7. One week of up data is not a trend. Wait for that reading and the monthly report before drawing conclusions.

A closeup of Pete Newsome, looking into the camera and smiling.

About Pete Newsome

Pete Newsome is the President of 4 Corner Resources, the staffing and recruiting firm he founded in 2005. 4 Corner is a member of the American Staffing Association and TechServe Alliance and has been Clearly Rated's top-rated staffing company in Central Florida for seven consecutive years. Recent awards and recognition include being named to Forbes' Best Recruiting and Best Temporary Staffing Firms in America, Business Insider's America's Top Recruiting Firms, The Seminole 100, and The Golden 100. Pete is a freqent conference speaker on the topic of AI's impact on jobs, and he hosts Cornering The Job Market, a weekly show covering real-time workforce trends, analyisis, and news. Connect with Pete on LinkedIn