Person shaking a digital, AI-generated hand emerging from a laptop

New ZipRecruiter research makes a compelling case, only to immediately complicate it. Job seekers who frequently use AI in their search receive job offers at a rate of 76%, compared to 33% for those who avoid AI entirely. That’s more than twice the offer rate. Frequent AI users are also more than four times as likely to rate their job search as “good.”

ZipRecruiter economist Nicole Bachaud is careful about the causation arrow, though. The benefits may partly reflect that more-resourced, more-connected, and more-confident job seekers are the ones adopting AI in the first place. People who already have structural advantages in the labor market (stronger networks, higher education, white-collar employers that provide tools and training) are also more likely to use AI. The data shows a strong correlation, not necessarily a recipe.

That context matters because the gaps inside the data are just as important as the headline. Education is the strongest predictor of AI adoption: 92% of graduate degree holders use AI in their job search, compared to 60% of high school graduates. White-collar workers are more than twice as likely to have AI tools provided by their employer, 41% versus 19% for other workers. Even among graduate degree holders, the gender split is notable: 65% of women are frequent AI users versus 80% of men, and 42% of women avoid AI tools altogether compared to 34% of men. AI is amplifying existing advantages, not leveling the field.

The first-time job seeker picture deserves attention from employers doing campus and early-career recruiting. New entrants are the most AI-engaged group, using it more for interview prep (39% vs 27% for experienced seekers) and LinkedIn profile generation, but they’re also the most anxious. 42% worry “a great deal” that AI will devalue their skills before they’ve even had a chance to build any. They’re also far more likely to have already encountered a fully automated interview (32% vs 13%) or an AI-analyzed video screening (40% vs 19%). This is the reality new grads are navigating right now, and it connects directly to the anxiety we’ve been tracking in the entry-level market all spring.

The transparency gap is the practical takeaway for employers. 68% of job seekers are moderately or very concerned about how AI is being used in hiring, particularly not knowing why they were rejected or how they were evaluated. Among women, 37% are “very concerned” about AI-led dehumanization in hiring. That’s a brand and pipeline problem. The companies that publish clear policies on where AI is and isn’t involved in hiring decisions will attract better, more trusting candidates than those that don’t.

Weekly Claims Fall to 189,000, One of the Lowest Readings of the Year

Initial jobless claims dropped sharply for the week ending April 25, falling 26,000 to 189,000 on a seasonally adjusted basis. The prior week was revised up slightly to 215,000. The four-week moving average fell to 207,500, down 3,500, and the insured unemployment rate held at 1.2% for the week ending April 18. Continuing claims came in at 1,785,000, down 23,000 from the prior week. Year-over-year, the improvement is clear: the comparable week in 2025 saw 239,000 initial claims and a 1.3% insured rate.

189,000 is a number worth pausing on. The four-week average has been parked above 207,000 for most of the spring; a single week doesn’t change the trend, and these numbers get revised. But the direction is consistent: layoffs aren’t accelerating. People who have jobs are largely keeping them. The challenge remains on the hiring side, not the layoff side. Low claims and slow hiring are the same dynamic we’ve been tracking for months: a frozen middle, not a collapsing one.

State-level data adds texture. New York added 2,885 initial claims with layoffs flagged in transportation and warehousing, healthcare, and educational services, three separate sectors in one week. Kentucky cited manufacturing. On the other side, New Jersey dropped 4,280 and Pennsylvania fell 2,742, with Pennsylvania noting fewer layoffs in transportation, administrative support, food services, and construction. Regional labor markets continue to diverge significantly from the national headline. The highest insured unemployment rates sit in New Jersey (2.5%), Massachusetts (2.2%), Washington (2.2%), California (2.1%), and Rhode Island (2.1%), all running at roughly double the national rate.

The Chicago Fed Is Forecasting April Unemployment at 4.23%

The Chicago Fed’s April 30 Labor Market Indicators release puts the real-time unemployment rate forecast for April at 4.23%, a small step down from the March BLS reading of 4.26%. The model gives 56% odds the official BLS rate will decrease in April when rounded, a 25% chance it holds flat, and a 19% chance it ticks up. The improvement is driven by a small but measurable uptick in the Chicago Fed’s Hiring Rate for Unemployed Workers, the share of previously unemployed people successfully transitioning back into jobs.

The size of the move matters. A shift from 4.26% to 4.23% is a signal that the worst isn’t accelerating, which is different from saying things are getting meaningfully better. A better-than-even chance the rate ticks down is something. But the 19% chance of an increase is still real. We’ve been hovering in a narrow band since the start of the year, and one month’s Chicago Fed reading doesn’t break that pattern. The April BLS Employment Situation report releases next Friday, and whether the participation rate and actual hiring data confirm the Chicago Fed’s hiring-driven read is the question that actually matters. A lower unemployment rate driven by people leaving the labor force is a very different signal than one driven by people getting jobs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does using AI in your job search actually help you get hired?

ZipRecruiter’s Q1 2026 data shows job seekers who frequently use AI receive offers at 76%, more than twice the 33% rate for those who avoid it. ZipRecruiter cautions that the connection may not be fully causal, as more-resourced and more-connected job seekers tend to adopt AI at higher rates to begin with. That said, the gap is real and growing.

What AI tools should job seekers use to find a job?

ZipRecruiter’s research points to interview prep and resume optimization as the highest-impact use cases. First-time job seekers are already using AI heavily for interview practice (39%) and LinkedIn profile generation (27%). The most effective strategy is using AI as a thought partner to identify gaps between your resume and the job description, not to generate applications wholesale.

What were weekly jobless claims this week?

Initial claims fell to 189,000 for the week ending April 25, down 26,000 from the prior week and one of the lowest readings of 2026. The four-week average sits at 207,500. Continuing claims dropped to 1,785,000, with the insured unemployment rate holding at 1.2%.

What is the unemployment rate forecast for April 2026?

The Chicago Fed’s real-time model forecasts April unemployment at 4.23%, slightly below March’s official BLS reading of 4.26%. The model gives 56% odds that the official rate will decrease when April’s BLS Employment Situation report is released next Friday, with 19% odds of an increase.

A closeup of Pete Newsome, looking into the camera and smiling.

About Pete Newsome

Pete Newsome is the President of 4 Corner Resources, the staffing and recruiting firm he founded in 2005. 4 Corner is a member of the American Staffing Association and TechServe Alliance and has been Clearly Rated's top-rated staffing company in Central Florida for seven consecutive years. Recent awards and recognition include being named to Forbes' Best Recruiting and Best Temporary Staffing Firms in America, Business Insider's America's Top Recruiting Firms, The Seminole 100, and The Golden 100. He hosts Cornering The Job Market, a daily show covering real-time U.S. job market data, trends, and news, and The AI Worker YouTube Channel, where he explores artificial intelligence's impact on employment and the future of work. Connect with Pete on LinkedIn